Ashamed for humanity
-
- Yosutebito - Hermit
- Posts: 1828
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 11:51 am
- Location: closer now to the one I love :)
- Contact:
Honestly, I don't know which is more disgusting: This church, or the fact that they had to protest soldiers funerals before our lovely government really found it offensive. Apparently, protesting at AIDS victim's funerals is more acceptable?
It's all about "Freedom of Speech" until you start offending the wrong people. . . or protesting the wrong group.
*shrugs*
It's all about "Freedom of Speech" until you start offending the wrong people. . . or protesting the wrong group.
*shrugs*
"You have to keep your whits about you when you're losing your mind." - a friend


- klet
- Taiyo - Sun Fearer
- Posts: 2923
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 12:48 am
- Location: confused and wandering through life
- Contact:
The worst thing about this is that these people are a Christian church group. One would assume that means being accepting of others, even if you do not agree with their lifestyle. This is . . . sad . . .
) I'll admit that it sucks that political climate stops many good laws from being passed. But all you can really work on is the here and now.
I'm not trying to be argumentative or anything, but such a statement could make other readers a tad . . . passionate. So, yeah . . . here's a preemptive group hug -->
And a special one for kisara --> 

Well, there's not really anything you can do to change the past. I'd imagine that the political climate was extremely different back in the 1990's when the original protests occured (since I was a kid back then, I wasn't paying too much attention to it. Cartoons were much more interesting than stuffy old men.kisara wrote:Honestly, I don't know which is more disgusting: This church, or the fact that they had to protest soldiers funerals before our lovely government really found it offensive. Apparently, protesting at AIDS victim's funerals is more acceptable?

I'm not trying to be argumentative or anything, but such a statement could make other readers a tad . . . passionate. So, yeah . . . here's a preemptive group hug -->


There are literally no words that I can possible say to express how angry people like that make me! Quite saddening as well 

Last edited by Kujaku on Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Cloud
- Himajin - Get A Life
- Posts: 14443
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 6:36 pm
- Location: Cyberspace
- Contact:
I am glad you find this funny. I don't know.

The Three Laws of Robotics:
1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
-I, Robot (Asimov)
- Baakay
- Himajin - Get A Life
- Posts: 5106
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:06 pm
- Location: In the Dungeon of Anime
- Contact:
dang. Accidental addition. sorry bout that.
Last edited by Baakay on Tue Feb 07, 2006 6:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The permanent temptation of life is to confuse dreams with reality. The permanent defeat of life comes when dreams are surrendered to reality."
James A. Michener, The Drifters
James A. Michener, The Drifters
- Cloud
- Himajin - Get A Life
- Posts: 14443
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 6:36 pm
- Location: Cyberspace
- Contact:
I am always honest.

The Three Laws of Robotics:
1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
-I, Robot (Asimov)
- Baakay
- Himajin - Get A Life
- Posts: 5106
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:06 pm
- Location: In the Dungeon of Anime
- Contact:
Wow, that's just the icing on an already-sucky day.
We had a bit of a fracas here a few weeks ago when a service for our first killed-in-Iraq soldier got picketed by some anti-war protestors.
I thought it was incredibly tasteless of the protestors to choose the time of the family's greatest pain to picket. I know why they did it -- to get air time -- and I don't necessarily disagree with their sentiment. But for crying out loud, this soldier was doing his job. He paid his price. Have some respect for his family, his sense of duty, and his sacrifice. Picket elsewhere.
But THIS!! I can't get over the depths. Honestly. So very sad; and sickening.
Look in the mirror first. Geez.

We had a bit of a fracas here a few weeks ago when a service for our first killed-in-Iraq soldier got picketed by some anti-war protestors.
I thought it was incredibly tasteless of the protestors to choose the time of the family's greatest pain to picket. I know why they did it -- to get air time -- and I don't necessarily disagree with their sentiment. But for crying out loud, this soldier was doing his job. He paid his price. Have some respect for his family, his sense of duty, and his sacrifice. Picket elsewhere.
But THIS!! I can't get over the depths. Honestly. So very sad; and sickening.
Look in the mirror first. Geez.
"The permanent temptation of life is to confuse dreams with reality. The permanent defeat of life comes when dreams are surrendered to reality."
James A. Michener, The Drifters
James A. Michener, The Drifters
- Not Sir Phobos
- Taiyo - Sun Fearer
- Posts: 2864
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 6:34 pm
- Location: How do the map makers know "I'm here"?
- Contact:
- blueheaven
- Chiteijin - Cave Dweller
- Posts: 2304
- Joined: Sat May 11, 2002 2:36 am
- Location: Henderson, NV
- Contact:
I've met the guy, and he is a horrible human being. He comes to UNLV campus every year and does his "God Hates Fags" routine. He picketed Matthew Shepherds funeral years back. Fred Phelps is a disgusting human being and his followers are all whores to his cause.
Time is but an illusion. Lunch time...doubly so.
- Baakay
- Himajin - Get A Life
- Posts: 5106
- Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 6:06 pm
- Location: In the Dungeon of Anime
- Contact:
Not stupid at all! It absolutely would be.Pudge wrote:I know that you all are going to think this
is a truly stupid response, but for some
reason, when I read that article, I couldn't
help but think this would be a perfect piece
for a college ethics class debate.
After I read this the first time I was upstairs puttering away on a Peach-igo cel and thinking about Klet's remark about the political climate in the 90's. And yeah, you know... what's the saddest thing is that people USED to understand that freedom of religion, in the minds of the founders, meant freedom to practice ANY religion, or NONE, without being harrassed.
And people used to understand that differences of opinion were not only inevitable, but absolutely, 100% necessary in the kind of representative republic we have here in the US. Can't have this kind of government without them. But the idea is that you RESPECT other people's differences, you allow them to be different, you understand that they may actually be right and you may actually be wrong...and you try, gently and tactfully and respectfully, to persuade them to your point of view.
But you don't picket their funerals. What a sad state of affairs.
"The permanent temptation of life is to confuse dreams with reality. The permanent defeat of life comes when dreams are surrendered to reality."
James A. Michener, The Drifters
James A. Michener, The Drifters
- Cloud
- Himajin - Get A Life
- Posts: 14443
- Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 6:36 pm
- Location: Cyberspace
- Contact:
Humans are not always infallible.

The Three Laws of Robotics:
1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
-I, Robot (Asimov)