If you don't mind, I'll look at each of the points you've raised (and I love Hankens and have them, too...as well as Rilezu...)
Angelic-Lair wrote:- They are one-of-a-kind post-production pieces.
This is certainly true of Rilezu. Some Hankens, however, are made before a production even starts.
Angelic-Lair wrote:- More attention is put into their making, and the artists doing them are hand picked for that particular job, not like a non-key cel for example.
This is true of Hankens, Rilezu, and... most of the production cels in this contest.
Angelic-Lair wrote:- When a rilezu is made, they pick a scene/character/moment that is interesting and/or attractive, so that it sells better. They also tend to pick key/end shots, as well as openings/endings.
Again, true of Hankens, Rilezu, and production cels likely to be entered into this contest.
Angelic-Lair wrote:- Rilezu can be quite expensive. We've seen rilezu in the hanken price range many times.
I'm gonna sound like a broken record,

so let me just say that several of the production cels I have cost more than my Rilezu, or several of my Hankens. I think that is true of a lot (though not all) of the cels in this contest...
Angelic-Lair wrote:Might we also point out that in 2005, rilezu and hanken were indeed in the same category.
But that was the only time they were. Usually, Rilezu have been allowed in all categories.
Angelic-Lair wrote:Regardless though, if you're not comfortable judging rilezu as a "best-of" category, how can you be comfortable judging hanken that way?
That's easy! Since a Hanken is made to sell a show, either to it's fanbase on product, or to the targeted or general public in ads, I just pick the image that is the most appealing to me as a potential consumer (viewer) of the show, or purchaser of a product. That's the test that Hankens face in the real world, so we really get to judge them by how well they fill their actual design purpose!
