Star Trek thoughts...

Talk about anything you'd like! Play games, tell jokes, and share your life.
Post Reply
User avatar
blueheaven
Chiteijin - Cave Dweller
Posts: 2304
Joined: Sat May 11, 2002 2:36 am
Location: Henderson, NV
Contact:
Contact blueheaven

Post by blueheaven »

Arguing the lack of physics accuracy in a Star Trek film is like complaining that Megan Fox doesn't have her doctorate.
Time is but an illusion. Lunch time...doubly so.
Top
User avatar
dbzmomma
Taiyo - Sun Fearer
Posts: 2714
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2002 9:37 pm
Location: with Sawyer in a grass hut
Contact:
Contact dbzmomma

Post by dbzmomma »

blueheaven wrote:Arguing the lack of physics accuracy in a Star Trek film is like complaining that Megan Fox doesn't have her doctorate.
Heh! You have to suspend disbelief for scifi, which, by definition, is fiction! Scientists agree pretty much that you can't travel at the speed of light or faster, and even if you could, there are no habitable planets we could reach - if there ARE any habitable planets.

So ... I adore scifi for the simple reason that it's escape and wonder and speculation and just plain fun.

When I used to do more writing, I loved making up my own worlds. Maybe I have a creator-complex (whaddya call it?).
Vicci

Grand Reopening of Momma's Addiction Rubberslug Gallery!
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Anything”