The Little Mermaid III

Talk about anything you'd like! Play games, tell jokes, and share your life.
Post Reply
User avatar
Caroline
Kuwabarakuwabara - Oh My God!
Posts: 618
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:06 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

The Little Mermaid III

Post by Caroline »

are there any fans of disney's the little mermaid here? i have been trying to get some more information about "the little mermaid III" ever since the sneak preview was released on dvd. the most official information is from wikipedia, and it seems to contradict itself. the plot is currently rumored to be a prequel to the original film, but voice actors have been cast for ariel's daughter, melody, and her human friends.

just wondering... thoughts? speculations? i wanna know! :D
User avatar
Elfstalker
Sushi Ninja
Posts: 2298
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2002 10:06 pm
Location: Konoha's Sushi Shop
Contact:

Post by Elfstalker »

...I didn't even know there was a second movie. X|
"He knows the crimson of rage, and the azure of despair... but his eyes will never change; the purity of white."

Image

Cel Gallery
http://rheytarian.rubberslug.com
User avatar
sailorsv13
Kuwabarakuwabara - Oh My God!
Posts: 663
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 12:58 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Post by sailorsv13 »

I do not know anything about the third movie but I am excited, even if sequals are never as good as the originals ^.^

~ Bri ~
User avatar
Cloud
Himajin - Get A Life
Posts: 14443
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 6:36 pm
Location: Cyberspace
Contact:

Post by Cloud »

Would you like to know? I can't think of anything. You think of something.
Image
The Three Laws of Robotics:
1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
-I, Robot (Asimov)
User avatar
wELCOME cONSUMER
Taiyo - Sun Fearer
Posts: 2965
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:52 pm
Location: Living in hyelakingsfan's head.
Contact:

Post by wELCOME cONSUMER »

I was wondering the same thing after seeing the teaser. I hope it features some better animation than Mermaid II did :x
"Devoted to all things lovely to consume"
Image
| Amazon | eBay | rubberslug | facebook |
User avatar
Okuni
Kamisama - God
Posts: 267
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 3:43 pm
Location: Hobgoblin Central
Contact:

Post by Okuni »

Elfstalker wrote:...I didn't even know there was a second movie. X|
same here.. :?
But, that's Disney for you. Rip a story for as much as you can while making it completely child friendly. :dh

I believe, in the original story, that either the prince or the mermaid died. Probably the mermaid. She loved the prince so much she gave her life to save him or something like that.
User avatar
wELCOME cONSUMER
Taiyo - Sun Fearer
Posts: 2965
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:52 pm
Location: Living in hyelakingsfan's head.
Contact:

Post by wELCOME cONSUMER »

The original Hans Christian Andersen story? The mermaid dies. She makes a deal with the sea witch that, if she can get the prince to love her, she'll obtain a mortal soul. The spell requires the witch to cut out the mermaid's tongue in exchange for legs. The prince ends up marrying a princess, resulting in the mermaid throwing herself into the sea. Her body dissolves and transforms into sea foam and she becomes a daughter of the air. This way, she can gain an eternal soul by doing good deeds.

It's really kind of ridiculous. Hans Christian Andersen was very unlucky in love and most of his stories tend to have twisted endings. This one in particular kind of goes on and on, a sort of extended epilogue. It's not really a "happy ending." In the original Disney version, the one Walt himself worked on, had a much more depressing ending. The mermaid is transformed into foam and that's it. No "daughter of air eternal soul" business. I think it might've been a concept for Fantasia, since Fantasia was meant to be annual anthology.

Some Disney sequels are clever. Such as Kronk's New Groove. That movie is cute and as amusing as the Emperor TV series. The Lilo & Stitch sequels were well-done, as was the Peter Pan: Return to Neverland movie. Sequels are a good way to make money and keep a property fresh for newer generations, such as Bambi II and Cinderella III. Cinderella III actually has a rather clever plot involving magic. I don't like all sequels, mostly because I feel they dilute the impact of the original film. Plus, the farming out of the animation to cheaper studios in Korea can be annoying. The quality tends to vary, Little Mermaid II looks extremely cheap for example.
"Devoted to all things lovely to consume"
Image
| Amazon | eBay | rubberslug | facebook |
User avatar
HotIce
Senpai - Elder
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:40 pm
Location: oHIo
Contact:

Post by HotIce »

I'm not a huge fan of The Little Mermaid... but I might take a guess that if III is a prequel to the 1st one... but the daughter and human friends are in it... it could very well be ariel telling her daughter and stuff the story of her life as a mermaid?
User avatar
Cloud
Himajin - Get A Life
Posts: 14443
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 6:36 pm
Location: Cyberspace
Contact:

Post by Cloud »

Under what circumstances?
Image
The Three Laws of Robotics:
1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
-I, Robot (Asimov)
User avatar
HotIce
Senpai - Elder
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 12:40 pm
Location: oHIo
Contact:

Post by HotIce »

like a campfire sit around group!
User avatar
Cloud
Himajin - Get A Life
Posts: 14443
Joined: Fri Dec 06, 2002 6:36 pm
Location: Cyberspace
Contact:

Post by Cloud »

Interesting comparison.
Image
The Three Laws of Robotics:
1. A robot may not injure a human being, or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
-I, Robot (Asimov)
User avatar
wELCOME cONSUMER
Taiyo - Sun Fearer
Posts: 2965
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 12:52 pm
Location: Living in hyelakingsfan's head.
Contact:

Post by wELCOME cONSUMER »

A campfire under water? hehehe :)

That's actually an interesting theory Hotice, you might indeed be right.
"Devoted to all things lovely to consume"
Image
| Amazon | eBay | rubberslug | facebook |
User avatar
Caroline
Kuwabarakuwabara - Oh My God!
Posts: 618
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 5:06 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Contact:

Post by Caroline »

yea, you are probably right. i dunno if i really like that idea, but a prequel would be better than continuing the story. i really disliked melody's character and dont care to see more of her. "the little mermaid" was one of the films that inspired me to pursue animation... so i am loyal to it. the animation in the sequel wasn't *horrible*... there was a lot of reuse. the character designs were really weak and the plot was predictable. but i know some of the artists who worked on the film and they had an extremely talent group.
Post Reply