(don't get me started on storage!

Lifetime machinery test use is about $7000 + a student working on it to pay. About paper conservation there are already publications available in university press around the globe and museum conservator able to assist. Paper material is known and mastered, ain't as problematic as cel to manage in time, as cels are only some decades old whereas paper are centuries. By providing air ventilation, regulated temperature/humidity and absorbing pollutant, most of the job is done for a transmission or a donation.Keropi wrote:A more realistic test would be figuring out what warm/hot air humidity does to paper long term. If I moved to Hawaii some day and took my sketch bags with me, I wonder if I would be better served by stacking them out there too. Obviously a specialized environmental cabinet would be best, but if I didn't feel like paying for one and the electricity bill maybe I should just stack them there too.
I guess it all comes down to what type of paper damage am I trying to avoid the most? And I think foxing on production sketches would look terrible.
Not that expensive, some little adjustment only cost tens or hundreds. Depending on the cost of your collectibles and the conservation level you like to reach.Keropi wrote:I don't feel like paying for a controlled environment. I've read books about paper conservation, but they do a lot of generalizing.
Mostly wroten in tempered weather conditions. Maybe Indian film institute publications would be more interesting for your needs, as they discovered the vinagar syndrom due to local weather conditions.Keropi wrote:They either generalize too much on things I already know about or they are too specific and don't fit my particular circumstance.
Between Scylla and CharybdisKeropi wrote:It's more like I'm trying to balance one form of paper damage versus another. Ideally I would like ventilate all of my paper collectibles, but when when you're talking about exposing them to Hawaiian humidity that's something else entirely.